Yasutaka Uchiyama vs Jarryd Chaplin Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L L W W L
Form
L L W L L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Uchiyama 1 - 0 Chaplin
They have played 2 sets in total, with Uchiyama winning 2 and Chaplin winning 0. The last match between Uchiyama and Chaplin was at the Kaohsiung Challenger, 17-09-2016, Q1 round, Hard with Yasutaka Uchiyama getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Yasutaka Uchiyama | 1 |
| Jarryd Chaplin | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:26:56 | Average Match Time | 1:26:56 |
| 66% (38/58) | 1st Serve % | 65% (55/84) |
| 82% (31/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (41/55) |
| 85% (17/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (13/29) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 36% (30/84) | Return Points Win % | 17% (10/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yasutaka Uchiyama Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Soon-Woo Kwon
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
42%
(
36 of
86)
5
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 1-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
40%
(
26 of
65)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
24 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
77)
8
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikoloz Basilashvili
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
3
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jozef Kovalik
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
7
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jarryd Chaplin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Bradley Mousley
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
12
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
16 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Jianhui Li
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam El Mihdawy
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
40%
(
14 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Christopher Rosensteel
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabiano De Paula
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sekou Bangoura
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jarryd Chaplin
Player
Mark Oljaca
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Austin Krajicek
Player
Jarryd Chaplin
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (454/364) | Win/Loss | 51% (73/71) |
| 54% (1021/879) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (162/161) |
| 52% (9561/8876) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1539/1481) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 3971 | Aces Total | 268 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1205 | Total Double Faults | 219 |
| 1:12:47 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 548.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.79 |
| 62% (26012/41861) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1914/3095) |
| 73% (18979/26012) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1347/1914) |
| 51% (8125/15849) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (536/1181) |
| 38% (1302/3437) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (75/210) |
| 36% (15285/42360) | Return Points Win % | 34% (984/2904) |
| 56% (445/796) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (73/143) |
| 33% (4/12) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (151/317) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 36% (16/45) |
| 56% (144/258) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 85% (438/373) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (75/64) |
| 15% (438/64) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (75/10) |
| 21% (380/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (69/9) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
